TASK
I chose Font Idea 1 because it
allowed more freedom in form and expression compared to the other
concepts. The organic and fluid approach gave me more space to
explore movement, irregularity, and personality in the letterforms.
During the process, this idea felt more intuitive and flexible,
making it easier to develop connections between letters and build a
consistent system. I also felt that this direction better reflected
my interest in expressive and experimental typography, which is why
I decided to continue developing this idea into the final
typeface.
- Process Work -
Sketching the Letterforms
I began by sketching loose letterforms and
experimenting with different stroke shapes and outlines. At this
stage, the focus was on exploring how fluid movement could be
translated into letter shapes, without worrying too much about
consistency or refinement.
fig1.1 sketching
As the exploration progressed, I
started building connections between letters by reusing similar
structures. Certain letterforms were developed from the same base
shapes to create visual consistency across the alphabet. This helped
the typeface feel more unified while still keeping its organic and
irregular qualities.
fig1.2 similar structures
After finalising the sketches, I refined the letterforms using a
grid system. This step helped me control proportions, alignment,
and stroke consistency across all characters. Using the grid
allowed the typeface to remain expressive while becoming more
structured.
fig1.3 attempt uppercase
fig1.4 attempt lowercase
fig1.5 number design
Digitalizing the Typeface
After refining the letterforms on
the grid, all designs were transferred into FontLab. This step
marked the transition from hand-drawn exploration to a functional
digital typeface, allowing further refinement and consistency
checks.
fig 1.6 all design move into fontlab
Kerning and spacing were adjusted to improve
readability and overall text rhythm. This stage involved testing
different letter combinations and making small adjustments to
achieve a more balanced and even visual flow.
fig1.8 kerning in fontlab
Font Presentation
After completing the basic structure of the typeface, I began exploring different ways of presenting the font visually. Instead of showing the letters in a standard layout, I experimented with expressive compositions that emphasised the character and mood of the type.
Through overlapping, rotation, and scale variation, I aimed to transform the letterforms into visual elements rather than just readable text. This stage allowed me to explore how typography can function as both language and image.
fig 1.9 process font presentation
In this final presentation, I experimented with overlapping and layering the letterforms to create a sense of movement and tension. The focus here is on visual impact rather than readability, showing the expressive and sculptural quality of the typeface.
fig 2.0 font presentation 1
This layout explores the typeface as a repeating pattern, using contrast in scale and color to create focus within the composition.
fig 2.1 font presentation 2
This layout combines typography with a short statement to communicate the concept behind the typeface. The compact vertical arrangement emphasises rhythm and reinforces the idea that type can be felt as well as read.
fig 2.2 font presentation 3
Here, the full character set is presented to review consistency in proportions, stroke weight, and style. This step confirms that the typeface works as a complete system rather than individual letters.
fig 2.3 font presentation 4
This image highlights the structure of a single letterform to show the relationship between curves and straight strokes. It helped clarify the overall design logic of the typeface.
fig 2.4 font presentation 5
Font Application
After completing the typeface, I applied it to a simulated brand context to test its practicality. The font was used across various applications such as packaging, signage, and printed materials. Through these mockups, the type is tested for clarity, adaptability, and aesthetic consistency across different formats and surfaces.
fig 2.5 font application menu design
fig 2.6 font application takeaway packaging
fig 2.7 font application exterior signage
fig 2.8 font application storefront hanging sign
fig 2.9 font application takeaway packaging
SUBMISSION
fig 3.0 fontlab screenshot
fig 3.1 presentation font 1 (JPEG)
fig 3.2 presentation font 2 (JPEG)
fig 3.3 presentation font 3 (JPEG)
fig 3.4 presentation font 4 (JPEG)
fig 3.5 presentation font 5 (JPEG)
fig 3.6 all presentation font (PDF)
fig 3.7 application font 1 (JPEG)
fig 3.8 application font 2 (JPEG)
fig 3.9 application font 3 (JPEG)
fig 4.0 application font 4 (JPEG)
fig 4.1 application font 5 (JPEG)
fig 4.2 all application font (PDF)
REFLECTION
Experience
This project was challenging in a way that I did not expect at the beginning. During the early sketching stage, the process felt quite free and intuitive. I focused mainly on exploring organic movement and expressive shapes, without thinking too much about rules or structure. At that point, I assumed that designing a typeface was mostly about visual style.
However, as I moved into refining the letterforms and working with grids, the process became much more demanding. Maintaining consistency across all characters required a lot of patience and repeated adjustments. Transferring the designs into FontLab was especially challenging, as small issues that were not obvious in sketches became very clear in digital form. This stage forced me to slow down and rethink many design decisions.
Observation
Throughout the project, I realised that expressive typography still depends heavily on structure. Even though the typeface was intended to look fluid and organic, it could not function properly without controlled proportions, spacing, and alignment.
Working digitally helped me notice problems that I might have ignored earlier, particularly in spacing and kerning. Some letterforms looked successful on their own but felt unbalanced when placed next to others. When applying the typeface to mockups, I also observed how scale and context affected readability. These observations helped me understand that typography needs to work as a system, not just as individual forms.
Finding
This project taught me that type design is a balance between expression and function. A typeface can be visually interesting, but without careful refinement, it will not work effectively in real applications.
More importantly, this project changed how I approach typography. I now pay more attention to spacing, consistency, and how type behaves in different contexts. Instead of focusing only on the final outcome, I have learned to value the process behind each design decision. This experience has given me a clearer understanding of typography as both a creative and technical discipline.
Comments
Post a Comment